Complainant vs respondent

Respondent is ORDERED to return to complainant Eduardo B. Manalang, within 30 days from notice, the sum of P270,000.00 with an interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum from the date of the promulgation of this Resolution until fully paid. [51]

I n Flores vs. Chua, the respondent lawyer was disbarred after he was found guilty of notarizing a forged deed of sale. The penalty of disbarment was imposed because in a previous administrative case, respondent was found guilty of violating Rule 1.01[16] of the Code of Professional Responsibility.For the Court's resolution is a Complaint [1] dated November 27, 2014 filed before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) by complainant Nicolas Robert Martin Egger …Note: A Complainantt is the term used to describe the person who makes a complaint to the Human Rights and Diversity Officer (HRDO) about a breach of the Sexual Violence Prevention Policy. The Respondent is the term used to describe the person who is accused in, or is responding to, the complaint.Respondent deliberately disregarded the writ of possession issued in G.R. No. 157660 entitled Eligio P. Mallari v.Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank.The Investigating Commissioner reiterated the long-standing rule that upon the failure of a mortgagor to redeem the property within the prescribed period, a winning bidder becomes the absolute owner of the property and the issuance of a writ ...If we live long enough, and make and keep enough friends, we’re bound to encounter neediness. But while we If we live long enough, and make and keep enough friends, we’re bound to encounter neediness. But while we’re more likely to recogniz...This is an administrative complaint [1] against respondent Atty. Leonardo M. Real for violation of Canon 1, Rule 1.01 and Canon 7, Rule 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) for non-payment of just debts and issuing worthless checks. The Case Complainant Eleanor V. Francisco (complainant) is the owner of a property located in Carigma St. corner Burgos St., …

Score: 4.8/5 (65 votes) . The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court below, as either party can appeal the decision thereby making themselves the petitioner and their adversary the respondent.Although celebrities may complain (justifiably) about having virtually no privacy when walking among the little people, that isn’t always the case. Celebs can fly on private planes and sail on private yachts. They can rent massive villas fo...The Complainant is the person who initiates a Formal Complaint and the Respondent is the person against whom the Formal Complaint is made. Is appellant the plaintiff or …Being a co-owner of the subject property, complainant engaged the services of respondent to file an unlawful detainer case against Carmelita S. Garlito with the Municipal Trial …MARIANO S. MACIAS, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. ALANIXON A. SELDA, RESPONDENT. DECISION. PUNO, J.: ... When respondent executed his affidavit of May 22, 2000 retracting his reason for withdrawing as counsel for Norma T. Lim, he acknowledged, under oath, his misrepresentation. He misled the court in clear violation of his oath as lawyer and failed to ...Score: 4.8/5 (65 votes) . The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court below, as either party can appeal the decision thereby making themselves the petitioner and their adversary the respondent. The submission of the certificate to file action, which evidences the non-conciliation between the parties in the barangay, is a pre-condition for the filing of a complaint in court. 14 Complainant claims that there is no such certificate in the complaint filed by respondent on behalf of Fortunato Jadulco, et al. Instead, what respondent submitted was the certificate to file action in the ...

A.C. No. 5280 March 30, 2004. WILLIAM S. UY, complainant, vs. ATTY. FERMIN L. GONZALES, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.: William S. Uy filed before this Court an administrative case against Atty. Fermin L. Gonzales for violation of the confidentiality of their lawyer-client relationship. The complainant alleges:Complaints against airlines are increasing as more people realize they can file grievances with the government about bad flights. By clicking "TRY IT", I agree to receive newsletters and promotions from Money and its partners. I agree to Mo...I n Flores vs. Chua, the respondent lawyer was disbarred after he was found guilty of notarizing a forged deed of sale. The penalty of disbarment was imposed because in a previous administrative case, respondent was found guilty of violating Rule 1.01[16] of the Code of Professional Responsibility.Published on: October 27, 2016. Respondent vs respondant check which spelling is correct on WhichIsCorrect.com - Free Online English Dictionary. Definition for …Respondant. Respondant is an incorrect spelling of Respondent. In law, a respondent is a person against whom a petition is filed. The respondent is required to …A.C. No. 6971 February 23, 2006. QUIRINO TOMLIN II, Complainant, vs. ATTY. SALVADOR N. MOYA II, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.: On December 1, 2003, Quirino Tomlin II filed a complaint 1 before the Commission on Bar Discipline of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) against Atty. Salvador N. Moya II for allegedly reneging on his monetary obligations and for having ...

Molecular biosciences.

Before the Court is a complaint for disbarment [1] filed on June 30, 2014 by Dr. Basilio Malvar (complainant) against Atty. Cora Jane P. Baleros (respondent) for acts amounting to grave misconduct consisting of falsification of public document, violation of Administrative Matter No. 02-8-13-SC or the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice (Notarial Rules) and the …On November 18, 2008, the complainant brought a complaint for immorality against the respondent in the Office of the Ombudsman (OMB-V-A-10-0345-G). On April 2, 2009, the complainant sent a letter to President Macapagal-Arroyo alleging therein that her husband had abandoned her and their children in order to live with another woman.Respondent also brought to the attention of the investigating judge that complainant's Memorandum came from Judge Caoibes' chambers [21] whom she claims was merely using petitioner to malign her. In his Report and Recommendation, investigating judge Maceda found Escritor's factual allegations credible as they were supported by testimonial and ...Whether the sexual encounter between the respondent and complainant was or was not with the latter’s consent is of no moment. Respondent clearly committed a disgraceful, grossly immoral and highly reprehensible act. Such conduct is a transgression of the standards of morality required of the legal profession and should be disciplined accordingly.July 12, 2016. A.C. No. 11316. PATRICK A. CARONAN, Complainant vs. RICHARD A. CARONAN a.k.a. "ATTY. PATRICK A. CARONAN," Respondent. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: For the Court's resolution is the Complaint-Affidavit1 filed by complainant Patrick A. Caronan (complainant), before the Commission on Bar Discipline (CBD) of the …

SBC Case No. 519 July 31, 1997. PATRICIA FIGUEROA, complainant, vs. SIMEON BARRANCO, JR., respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. ROMERO, J.: In a complaint made way back in 1971, Patricia Figueroa petitioned that respondent Simeon Barranco, Jr. be denied admission to the legal profession. Respondent had passed the 1970 bar examinations on the …For the Court's resolution is a Complaint [1] dated November 27, 2014 filed before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) by complainant Nicolas Robert Martin Egger (complainant) against respondent Atty. Francisco P. Duran (respondent), praying that the latter be meted disciplinary sanctions for his failure to perform his undertaking as counsel and to return …This bar matter refers to the complaint filed by Enrique Javier de Zuzuarregui (complainant) before the Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC) against Anthony de Zuzuarregui …Understanding the difference between these two terms is important in any legal case. The claimant is responsible for proving their case and providing evidence to support their claim, while the respondent has the …Respondent likewise failed to use temperate and respectful language in his pleading against complainant. In his Comment in Special Proceeding Case No. Q-95-23334 before RTC-QC Branch 77, respondent averred that Rufina collected "BILLIONS OF PESOS" in rent which were "DISSIPATED ON HER GAMBLING VICES."LIWAYWAY B. SAMSON, complainant, vs. HON. ANTONIA CORPUZ-MACANDOG, respondent. A.M. No. R-621-RTJ September 26, 1986. VICTORIA TORRES, complainant, vs. ... the other charges brought against respondent are indeed serious. Taken collectively, they cast a heavy shadow on respondent's moral, intellectual and attitudinal …A.C. No. 5439 January 22, 2007. ATTY. LUCIANO D. VALENCIA, Respondent. Before us is a complaint 1 dated May 2, 2001 filed by Clarita J. Samala (complainant) against Atty. Luciano D. Valencia (respondent) for Disbarment on the following grounds: (a) serving on two separate occasions as counsel for contending parties; (b) knowingly misleading the ...A.C. No. 6296 November 22, 2005. ATTY. EVELYN J. MAGNO, Complainant, vs. ATTY. OLIVIA VELASCO-JACOBA, Respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. GARCIA, J.: In her sworn complaint, as endorsed by the President of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP), Nueva Ecija Chapter, Atty. Evelyn J. Magno charged Atty. Olivia Velasco-Jacoba, a …However, the Respondent / Accused was absent therefore, a Petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C., was filed and allowed and for cross examination of P.W.1, finally the matter was directed to be listed on 14.10.2015. On 14.10.2015 the Complainant was absent and a Petition under Section 256 of cr.P.C., was filed and allowed. The accused was present ...20.5 The amount of P110,000.00 was paid to respondent Consunji as initial professional fees for the re-issuance of the titles for the properties of complainant BASECO at the Engineering Island; 20.6 The amount of P500,000.00 was received by respondent Consunji for settlement of representation expenses in relation to the properties of ...

Specifically, Adm. Matter OCA IPI No. 04-2113-RTJ was a result of the case before the sala of Judge Jose L. Madrid (RTC 51) entitled "Alita P. Gomez vs. Rodrigo Jarabo, et al.," for: Accion Publiciana and Damages, that was handled by respondent for the complainant Alita Gomez.

By Complaint-Affidavit [1] filed before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) on June 20, 2007, complainant Norma Nicolas sought the disbarment of respondent Atty. Jose Laki for violation of Canon 1, Rule 1.01 and 1.02; Canon 10, Rule 10.01; Canon 15, Rule 15.06; Canon 16, Rule 16.01 and 16.03; and Canon 18, Rule 18.03, all of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) [2] …When you’re sick or injured, your body may respond by creating inflammation. This can lead to pain, discomfort, swelling, heat, redness, fever, stiffness and other symptoms, according to Medical News Today. Many people opt to take medicatio...Dec 9, 2020 · Case: Crime of Rape. Facts: On April 4,2012, the victim AAA, then 12 year old, was awakened when the accused, Roger. Tilar (live in partner of BBB, AAA’s mother) who was then half-naked, removed her shorts and. underwear and immediately laid on top of her. The accused inserted his finger. Shortly thereafter, he. A.C. No. 5817 May 27, 2004. EMMA V. DE JUAN, complainant, vs. ATTY. OSCAR R. BARIA III, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. QUISUMBING, J.: In her Salaysay filed with the Office of the Bar Confidant on August 29, 2002, complainant, former client of respondent, charged respondent with negligence in handling her labor case and threats against her ...In this case, complainant submitted the following documents to prove her allegations: (1) the Service Agreement dated November 15, 2004 to prove the existence of attorney-client relationship between the parties; (2) the Petition for Annulment of Marriage [18] supposedly filed by respondent on December 8, 2004 with the RTC of Quezon City and ...Complainant is a resident of Bacoor, Cavite, while respondent's place of work is in Las Piñas City. Quite obviously, the sudden spark of "moral conscience" on the part of complainant Alejandro Estrada was stage-managed by an "unseen hand" against whom respondent had earlier filed an administrative complaint; hitting back, in other words.In CBD 16-4966,4 complainant charged respondent with using abusive, offensive, and improper language against her in his Counter-Affidavit dated November 16, 2015. The same contained respondent's response to a complaint she filed against him and April before the Office of the City Prosecutor in Manila for Falsification of Public Document under ...A.C. No. 5817 May 27, 2004. EMMA V. DE JUAN, complainant, vs. ATTY. OSCAR R. BARIA III, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. QUISUMBING, J.: In her Salaysay filed with the Office of the Bar Confidant on August 29, 2002, complainant, former client of respondent, charged respondent with negligence in handling her labor case and threats against her ...ALEJANDRO ESTRADA, complainant, vs. SOLEDAD S. ESCRITOR, respondent. PUNO, J.: The case at bar takes us to a most difficult area of constitutional law where man stands accountable to an authority higher than the state. To be held on balance are the state's interest and the respondent's religious freedom.A.C. No. 9925 September 17, 2014. ATTY. RONALDO E. RENTA, Respondent. Before us is a complaint 1 for disbarment filed by Mariano R. Cristobal against Atty. Ronaldo E. Renta. The facts are not disputed. Complainant engaged the services of Renta Pe & Associates Law Office for the filing of a "petition for recognition for the minors Codie Darnell ...

Coach andy.

Ku phog.

For the Court's resolution is a verified complaint/affidavit[1] dated March 1, 2006 filed before the Court by complainant Atty. Herminio Harry L. Roque, Jr. (complainant) against respondent Atty. Rizal P. Balbin (respondent) praying that the latter be subjected to disciplinary action for his alleged unprofessional conduct. The FactsAs nouns the difference between correspondent and respondent. is that correspondent is someone who or something which corresponds while respondent is person who answers for the defendant in a case before a court. In some legal systems, when one appeals a criminal case, one names the original court as defendant, but the state is the respondent.This prompted complainant to file the instant administrative complaint against respondent before the IBP-CBD. On September 26, 2016, the IBP-CBD issued an Order [8] requiring respondent to submit his answer to the complaint and furnish complainant with a copy thereof within fifteen (15) days from receipt, with a warning that failure to do so ...By Complaint-Affidavit [1] filed before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) on June 20, 2007, complainant Norma Nicolas sought the disbarment of respondent Atty. Jose Laki for violation of Canon 1, Rule 1.01 and 1.02; Canon 10, Rule 10.01; Canon 15, Rule 15.06; Canon 16, Rule 16.01 and 16.03; and Canon 18, Rule 18.03, all of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) [2] …However, respondent’s husband, upon learning that complainant was a relative, urged respondent to assist the complainant. Respondent alleged that she was not privy to the agreement between Engr. Arquero and complainant. Complainant scheduled the survey of one of the lots, Lot No. 5489, on January 13, 2001.Eager complainants of the dispute. Complainant. One who commences a legal process by a complaint. He ...EN BANC [A.C. No. 12079. November 10, 2020.] EDUARDO B. MANALANG, complainant, vs. ATTY. CRISTINA BENOSA BUENDIA, respondent. RESOLUTION PER CURIAM p : Before us is a disbarment complaint against Atty. Cristina Benosa Buendia (Atty. Buendia) for allegedly deceiving complainant Eduardo B. Manalang (Manalang) in connection …For the reasons that the complainant is already dead, that complainant had not completed his chore of submitting proof in support of his charges against the respondent, and that the respondent is already a centenarian long retired from the practice of the legal profession, it is hereby recommended that this case against respondent Atty. Crispin ...Complainant also revealed that respondent filed two (2) other administrative cases against a judge and an assisting judge in the RTC of Lucena City, which were dismissed because the issues raised were judicial in nature.[12] Complainant also disclosed that before his sala, respondent filed eighteen (18) repetitious and prohibited pleadings.[13]Complainant is the offended party in Criminal ( Crim.) Case No. 2014-22652 for theft pending before Branch 44 of the Regional Trial Court of Dumaguete City. Respondent is the counsel for the accused Blas Fier "Buddy" Manco ( Manco ). 2. Complainant alleged in his Complaint that Atty. Alvarico personally approached and spoke with him, telling ...Remedial action: after investigation the Commissioner finds the complaint is upheld but agrees remedial action with the respondent and complainant. 4. Sanction: ...JACKIYA A. LAO, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. BERTENI C. CAUSING, RESPONDENT. ... In Flores vs. Chua, the respondent lawyer was disbarred after he was found guilty of notarizing a forged deed of sale. The penalty of disbarment was imposed because in a previous administrative case, respondent was found guilty of violating Rule 1.01[16] of … ….

Score: 4.8/5 (65 votes) . The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court below, as either party can appeal the decision thereby making themselves the petitioner and their adversary the respondent. complainant (the person who made the complaint) and the respondent (the person, business or agency against whom the complaint was made) usually meet face to face, though not always. Sometimes the complainant and the respondent will bring along a support person or advocate, if the Commission agrees. Often, this will be the first time that theJun 10, 2014 · A.C. No. 7676 June 10, 2014 AMADO T. DIZON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. NORLITA DE TAZA, Respondent. Legal Ethics; Canon 16; Rule 16.01. FACTS: Amado Dizon alleged that he, along with his siblings, engaged the services of Romero De Taza Cruz and Associates to represent them in a case. Sulley Muntari was given a yellow card for dissent during an Italian league game, after he complained about persistent abuse from fans. Sulley Muntari, one of Ghana’s biggest soccer stars who plays in one of Europe’s top soccer leagues, is ...Note: A Complainantt is the term used to describe the person who makes a complaint to the Human Rights and Diversity Officer (HRDO) about a breach of the Sexual Violence Prevention Policy. The Respondent is the term used to describe the person who is accused in, or is responding to, the complaint. The Case In CBD 15-4821, Myriam Tan-Te Seng charged respondent Atty. Dennis C. Pangan with violations of Canon 1, Rules 1.01 and 1.02; Canon 15, Rules 15.02 and 15.03; and Canon 21, Rule 21.02 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), the Lawyer's Oath, and Rule 138, Section 20 of the Rules of Court.On the other hand, in CBD 16-4966, complainant charged …EN BANC [A.C. No. 12079. November 10, 2020.] EDUARDO B. MANALANG, complainant, vs. ATTY. CRISTINA BENOSA BUENDIA, respondent. RESOLUTION PER CURIAM p : Before us is a disbarment complaint against Atty. Cristina Benosa Buendia (Atty. Buendia) for allegedly deceiving complainant Eduardo B. Manalang (Manalang) in connection with the latter's petition for nullity of his marriage.1 Answer. Sorted by: 8. Defendant is normally used as the opposing party to a plaintiff, in a civil cause of action. It also refers to the accused in a criminal matter. …Respondent is ORDERED to return to complainant Eduardo B. Manalang, within 30 days from notice, the sum of P270,000.00 with an interest at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum from the date of the promulgation of this Resolution until fully paid. [51] Continuing, complainant averred that her friendship with respondent soured after her filing, in the later part of 2000, of criminal and disciplinary actions against the latter. What, per complainant's account, precipitated the filing was when respondent, then a member of the BFP promotion board, demanded a cellular phone in exchange for the ... Complainant vs respondent, The Complainant and the Respondent will have an equal opportunity to participate in the investigation, including an equal opportunity to be heard, submit evidence, and suggest witnesses. The parties are strongly encouraged to preserve relevant evidence and share all information they have regarding the matter. , That respondent received Php100,000.00 of the mortgage loan secured by the mortgagee on the aforementioned property of complainant; That respondent did not inform the complainant about the unauthorized mortgage and sale of his property; That respondent has a loan obligation to Mr. Roberto Ho;, 2 Des 2022 ... But both in civil and criminal cases, the person against whom a lawsuit is filed is called the defendant. Example of Plaintiff and Defendant. If ..., Respondent said he was merely effecting a lawful and valid change of management. Respondent alleged that a termination notice was sent to Garay but he refused to comply. On 1 April 2002, to ensure a smooth transition of managerial operations, respondent and the Nazareno-Relampagos group went to the bank to ask Garay to step down., 3 Jan 2013 ... Is "complainant" the same as "complainer"? In my point of view, "complainant" is the person who makes a formal complaint in court while ..., DIVINE GRACE P. CRISTOBAL, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. JONATHAN A. CRISTOBAL, RESPONDENT. ... Version of the Respondent. In his Answer12 dated September 8, 2010, Atty. Cristobal denied having a peaceful relationship during the early stages of their marital life as they often quarrelled even before they got married., Wex. respondent. The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal. The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court …, complainant (the person who made the complaint) and the respondent (the person, business or agency against whom the complaint was made) usually meet face to face, though not always. Sometimes the complainant and the respondent will bring along a support person or advocate, if the Commission agrees. Often, this will be the first time that the, For the Court's resolution is a Complaint [1] dated November 27, 2014 filed before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) by complainant Nicolas Robert Martin Egger (complainant) against respondent Atty. Francisco P. Duran (respondent), praying that the latter be meted disciplinary sanctions for his failure to perform his undertaking as counsel and to return …, respondent against herein complainant is an act done contrary to justice, honesty, modesty and good morals. The ling of perjury case with. P20,000,000.00 damages against respondent is intended merely to harass, to. injure, and oppress the complainant; 8. These practices committed by respondent are unprofessional and., SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. A.C. No. 7136 August 1, 2007. JOSELANO GUEVARRA, complainant, vs. ATTY. JOSE EMMANUEL EALA, respondent. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: Joselano Guevarra (complainant) filed on March 4, 2002 a Complaint for Disbarment 1 before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Committee on Bar Discipline (CBD) against Atty. Jose …, Plaintiff. A plaintiff (Π in legal shorthand) is the party who initiates a lawsuit (also known as an action) before a court. By doing so, the plaintiff seeks a legal remedy. Respondent. A respondent is a person who is called upon to issue a response to a communication made by another. The term is used in legal contexts, in survey methodology ..., A. No. 7136 August 1, 2007. JOSELANO GUEVARRA, complainant, vs. ATTY. JOSE EMMANUEL EALA, respondent. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: Joselano Guevarra (complainant) filed on March 4, 2002 a Complaint for Disbarment1 before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Committee on Bar Discipline (CBD) against Atty. Jose Emmanuel M. …, Complainant averred that respondent was very cruel and heartless to an inexperienced lawyer when he mutilated statements made in her pleadings in CBD Case No. 12-3457; and that he maliciously cropped and pasted portions of complainant's statement in her position paper to give the wrong impression before the IBP-Board of Governors (Board) that ..., May 12, 2017 · deceive the Commission. In Complainant’s view, the location of where the conversation between Ms. Moulton and Ms. Brooks took place was irrelevant. 6 Respondent’s continued practice of using female pronouns to refer to Lynn throughout its briefs reflects the same bias upon which it based its exclusion of Lynn from freely shopping at the Center. , Parties include plaintiff (person filing suit), defendant (person sued or charged with a crime), petitioner (files a petition asking for a court ruling), respondent (usually in opposition to a petition or an appeal), cross-complainant (a defendant who sues someone else in the same lawsuit), or cross-defendant (a person sued by a cross-complainant)., To bolster this claim, respondent pointed out that the complaint filed by complainant against Ms. Koa for estafa and violation of B.P. Blg. 22 was based not on the demand letter he drafted but on the demand letter prepared by Atty. Manuel A. Año. Respondent contended that he is a close friend of the opposing parties in the criminal cases. , A plaintiff, also known as a claimant or complainant, is an individual or entity that initiates a legal action by filing a lawsuit against another party. The plaintiff is the party who seeks redress for an alleged wrong or harm inflicted upon them., Organisms often respond to their environment through adaptation. Organisms that make an adjustment to environmental conditions in their own lifetime make physiological adaptation. If the adaptation takes place over several generations, the ..., RET. JUDGE VIRGILIO ALPAJORA , complainant, vs. ATTY. RONALDO ANTONIO V. CALAYAN , respondent. DECISION GESMUNDO , J p: Before the Court is a Counter-Complaint 1 ûled by complainant (Ret.) Judge Virgilio Alpajora (Complainant) against respondent Atty. Ronaldo Antonio V. Calayan (Respondent), which originated from an administrative, Respondent likewise failed to use temperate and respectful language in his pleading against complainant. In his Comment in Special Proceeding Case No. Q-95-23334 before RTC-QC Branch 77, respondent averred that Rufina collected "BILLIONS OF PESOS" in rent which were "DISSIPATED ON HER GAMBLING VICES.", Complainant claims that respondent yielded 'one (1) Super .38 cal. Springfield Automatic Pistol, SN NMII 3138, one (1) magazine with seven (7) live ammos and three (3) spent (empty) shells.' Complainant adds that respondent presented only an unsigned Memorandum Receipt (MR) of the firearm without any Mission Order or Permit to Carry. , A.C. No. 6116 August 1, 2012. ENGR. GILBERT TUMBOKON, Complainant, ATTY. MARIANO R. PEFIANCO, Respondent. Before the Court is an administrative complaint for disbarment filed by complainant Engr. Gilbert Tumbokon against respondent Atty. Mariano R. Pefianco for grave dishonesty, gross misconduct constituting deceit and grossly immoral conduct., Before us is a Complaint for Disbarment 1 filed by Adelfa Properties, Inc. (now Fine Properties, Inc.), as represented by Ma. Nalen Rosero-Galang, against respondent Atty. Restituto Mendoza (Atty. Mendoza), for allegedly violating the Lawyer's Oath and Canons 15, 17, 18, 21, and Rule 21.02 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). The facts are as follows:, [A.C. No. 4748. August 4, 2000] VICTORIA V. RADJAIE, complainant, vs. ATTY. JOSE O. ALOVERA, respondent. DECISION PER CURIAM: Atty. Jose O. Alovera, former Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Roxas City, Branch 17, faces disbarment for having penned a Decision [1] dated January 30, 1995 long after his retirement from the Judiciary on January 31, 1995 which ultimately divested ..., Here are some tips: Research and understand the difference between civil and criminal cases. Use “claimant” only when referring to the party making a claim or bringing a case to court. Use “respondent” only when referring to the party responding to the claim or …, LIWAYWAY B. SAMSON, complainant, vs. HON. ANTONIA CORPUZ-MACANDOG, respondent. A.M. No. R-621-RTJ September 26, 1986. VICTORIA TORRES, complainant, vs. ... the other charges brought against respondent are indeed serious. Taken collectively, they cast a heavy shadow on respondent's moral, intellectual and attitudinal …, Causing. [A.C. No. 12883. March 2, 2021.] ENRICO R. VELASCO, complainant, vs.ATTY. BERTENI C. CAUSING, respondent. This administrative case is rooted on the Complaint-Affidavit 1 for disbarment filed by Enrico R. Velasco (complainant) against Atty. Berteni C. Causing (Atty. Causing) before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for alleged ..., Respondent's Defense. According to respondent, the complainant knew that he was in the government service from the very start. In fact, he first met the complainant when he was still a district attorney in the Citizen's Legal Assistance Office (predecessor of PAO) of Biñan, Laguna and was assigned as counsel for the complainant's daughter. 6, [ A.C. No. 7446, December 09, 2020 ] MICHELLE A. BUENAVENTURA, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. DANY B. GILLE, RESPONDENT. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: This is a Petition for Suspension and Disbarment1 filed by complainant Michelle A. Buenaventura (Michelle) against Atty. Dany B. Gille (Atty. Gille) for Gross Misconduct., WINSTON BRIAN CHIA LAO AND CHRISTOPHER TROY CHIA LAO, RESPONDENTS; G.R. No. 207075, February 10, 2020 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON NATURALIZATION (SCN), PETITIONERS, v. JON NICHOLAS CHIA LAO, RESPONDENT. , For the Court's resolution is a verified complaint/affidavit[1] dated March 1, 2006 filed before the Court by complainant Atty. Herminio Harry L. Roque, Jr. (complainant) against respondent Atty. Rizal P. Balbin (respondent) praying that the latter be subjected to disciplinary action for his alleged unprofessional conduct. The Facts, PETER T. DONTON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. EMMANUEL O. TANSINGCO, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. CARPIO, J.: The Case. This is a disbarment complaint against respondent Atty. Emmanuel O. Tansingco ("respondent") for serious misconduct and deliberate violation of Canon 1, 1 Rules 1.01 2 and 1.02 3 of the Code of Professional Responsibility ("Code ...